CGF: News: Frog habitat destroyed on Phillips Brooks School property

News

News
Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Sign up for Email Updates
CGF In the News
Press Inquiries
Past Articles
Calendar

Frog habitat destroyed on Phillips Brooks School property
by Lennie Roberts

The celebrated jumping frog of Mark Twain's day isn't jumping with joy these days in Woodside. The 92-acre site owned by Phillips Brooks School is home to the federally protected California red-legged frog, which inhabits two small ponds on the property, along with the southwestern pond turtle and many other aquatic critters.

The frogs used to be found in vast areas of the state, but today their population has dwindled to such a degree that they are listed as a Federally Threatened Species. Any project that may affect their habitat is required to adopt strict measures to protect the frogs from any possibility of "taking" (killing).

The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the now-defunct Phillips Brooks School project, acknowledging that frogs are on the property, required that a 100-foot buffer zone be established around any wetland site on the property, where no disturbance would be allowed to occur. The EIR also recommended measures for fire protection such as mowing a fire break in the grasslands, but required that no mowing should invade the 100-foot buffer zone around the ponds and wetlands.

The ink was hardly dry on the EIR last June when the school, apparently at the specific request of the Woodside Fire Department, mowed a 100-foot wide swath through the grasslands along the edges of the property. In direct contravention of the EIR mitigation measures for the frog, the school invaded the buffer zone and mowed right up next to the edge of the wetlands around the ponds.

It is unknown whether any frogs were killed by this irresponsible mowing. There wasn't any investigation of the mowing until Committee for Green Foothills filed a complaint with the fish and wildlife agencies in July, and by then it was too late to look for dead frogs. However, under the Endangered Species Act, destroying habitat is also a violation of the law. Frogs use areas beyond ponds for foraging, and have been documented to range up to a mile from streams and wetlands, so this mowing has certainly altered conditions of the natural habitat on which they depend.

This incident points out an all too frequent pattern with EIRs and mitigation measures. Great attention is paid to instituting protections, and the applicant(s) profess that they are committed to being good stewards of the land, but over time critical mitigation measures are forgotten or ignored. With an institution, it is particularly difficult to ensure that mitigation measures become an enduring part of their operation, as institutional memories can be lost as people come and go.

Since the summertime devastation of the frog habitat, the Woodside Planning Commission voted 4-3 to deny the controversial proposed development of this rural property , planned for several years by Phillips Brooks School.

Meanwhile, the frogs didn't have a voice in this debate. We hope that Woodside's leaders will speak up for the frogs - and for open space - as they deliberate on future uses of this property.
Published October 2002 in Green Footnotes.
Page last updated November 4, 2002.

Photo by John Sullivan (red-legged frog), Ribbit Photography.


	News Subscribe to Our Newsletter Sign up for Email Updates CGF In the News Press Inquiries Past Articles Calendar			Frog habitat destroyed on Phillips Brooks School property by Lennie Roberts The celebrated jumping frog of Mark Twain's day isn't jumping with joy these days in Woodside. The 92-acre site owned by Phillips Brooks School is home to the federally protected California red-legged frog, which inhabits two small ponds on the property, along with the southwestern pond turtle and many other aquatic critters. The frogs used to be found in vast areas of the state, but today their population has dwindled to such a degree that they are listed as a Federally Threatened Species. Any project that may affect their habitat is required to adopt strict measures to protect the frogs from any possibility of "taking" (killing). The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the now-defunct Phillips Brooks School project, acknowledging that frogs are on the property, required that a 100-foot buffer zone be established around any wetland site on the property, where no disturbance would be allowed to occur. The EIR also recommended measures for fire protection such as mowing a fire break in the grasslands, but required that no mowing should invade the 100-foot buffer zone around the ponds and wetlands. The ink was hardly dry on the EIR last June when the school, apparently at the specific request of the Woodside Fire Department, mowed a 100-foot wide swath through the grasslands along the edges of the property. In direct contravention of the EIR mitigation measures for the frog, the school invaded the buffer zone and mowed right up next to the edge of the wetlands around the ponds. It is unknown whether any frogs were killed by this irresponsible mowing. There wasn't any investigation of the mowing until Committee for Green Foothills filed a complaint with the fish and wildlife agencies in July, and by then it was too late to look for dead frogs. However, under the Endangered Species Act, destroying habitat is also a violation of the law. Frogs use areas beyond ponds for foraging, and have been documented to range up to a mile from streams and wetlands, so this mowing has certainly altered conditions of the natural habitat on which they depend. This incident points out an all too frequent pattern with EIRs and mitigation measures. Great attention is paid to instituting protections, and the applicant(s) profess that they are committed to being good stewards of the land, but over time critical mitigation measures are forgotten or ignored. With an institution, it is particularly difficult to ensure that mitigation measures become an enduring part of their operation, as institutional memories can be lost as people come and go. Since the summertime devastation of the frog habitat, the Woodside Planning Commission voted 4-3 to deny the controversial proposed development of this rural property , planned for several years by Phillips Brooks School. Meanwhile, the frogs didn't have a voice in this debate. We hope that Woodside's leaders will speak up for the frogs - and for open space - as they deliberate on future uses of this property. Published October 2002 in Green Footnotes. Page last updated November 4, 2002.