> Home...

COMMITTEE FOR GREEN FOOTHILLS
> Learn about our projects...> Help save open space!> The latest news...> Support our work...> Find out about us...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

News

 

News
Subscribe  to Our Newsletter
Sign  up for Email Updates
CGF  In the News
Press  Inquiries
Past  Articles
Calendar

 

 

Where  are we going in Santa Clara County?
The State of the County,  Summer 2003
by Brian Schmidt

On one of my first weekends after starting work  as Committee for Green Foothills' Santa Clara County Legislative  Advocate, I brought out my camping gear and hiked to the Black Mountain  backpack camp in the Monte  Bello Open Space Preserve. The campsite perches on the inner edge  of the Santa Cruz mountains, where one can look down east at the foothills  and flatlands of the county, and look back west to the rolling green mountains  heading to the coast. Just as the Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District  advertised, the campsite rewarded me with a beautiful sunset, the colors  coming and going as winds ripped clouds across the sun. The view made  sleeping on the ground completely worthwhile.



However worthwhile that view was, my best view of the state of our county  happened when I couldn't exactly see it - at night. By 8 p.m. it was dark  and I had finished dinner, but I wasn't quite ready to sleep. I got up  and carefully walked a half-mile along the ridgeline, where the view opened  up to see east and south over what seemed to be the entire county. What  I saw is what we all have seen while flying into the Bay area at night:  lights, grids and ribbons of lights extending everywhere. It feels different,  though, so much more immense, when you stand there on the ground and see  the lights in front of you, instead of peering out, detached, from an  airplane. This part of my view showed the state of the county to be strikingly,  almost blindingly, full of humanity with all its needs and desires.

But the lights weren't really everywhere. The dark bulk of the eastern  foothills and Coyote Ridge; the diminished, scattered lights in the southern  farmlands; and of course the hills and mountains where I stood all showed  nature and open space to be as much a part of Santa Clara County as the  artificial lighting. Within the same county I could look at the bright  lights of San Jose while knowing I had to remember basic facts of mountain  lion awareness. The physical state of the county is a place where human  light and noise coexist, sometimes uneasily, with the dark quiet of open  space that we can all still enjoy.

The political state of Santa Clara County, and the chance to be proactive
The political state of the county can't be seen from Monte Bello Ridge,  but it can be seen in the daily newspapers. So much in politics is driven  by economics, and we all know the Bay Area to be mired in an economic  downturn. But this economic misery does have a silver lining. It slows,  for a brief moment, the tide of bad development projects threatening the  open spaces and natural resources that the Committee has fought to protect  for
the last 41 years . This state  of the county is an opportunity to consider what we need to do next, instead  of simply having the choice made for us by the proposal of yet another  monster development.

 Unfortunately, the recession has only slowed - not stopped - bad development.  As Jeff Segall reports in his article   on page 6, too-loose zoning in Stanford foothills may permit destructive  projects in the future. Further south, Coyote Valley needs monitoring,  and attempts to eliminate required access to some public-private golf  courses - and to build new courses - all ratchet up the development pressure.  Add a proposed 23,000 square-foot house here and there, and CGF could  easily spend all of its time and resources fighting bad ideas. That strategy  will only leave us overwhelmed, however, when the economy recovers and  starts pushing still more development into farmlands and open space.

The current state of Santa Clara County gives us a choice about how to  move forward. We can and must spend a great deal of time reacting  to proposals for bad development - stopping them outright when possible,  and minimizing their impact whenever that is not possible. As just one  example, we have opposed and will continue to oppose efforts to add new  dams and reservoirs in southern Santa Clara County.

 However, we must at least match the time spent on these kinds of efforts  with proactive efforts to  push land use policies in the right direction, and to seek permanent protection  of the most important places in the county. One example is a proposal  to create a riparian protection ordinance in the county, which would protect  rivers, streams, and creeks and their associated habitats. Time spent  on improving this single proposed ordinance could prevent dozens of projects  (or more) from encroaching on riparian habitat. The Committee has been  carefully monitoring this proposal and researching ways to strengthen  it. Strong environmental protections like this can redirect developers  away from sensitive areas and point them towards more appropriate urban  infill projects. We can seize other opportunities to be proactive, moving  beyond fighting individual development battles to change land use rules  that may not provide sufficient environmental protection. The Santa  Clara Valley Water District is increasingly interested in environmental  protection - and rare for these cash-strapped times, it has money to spend  on environmental protection. Committee for Green Foothills is helping  encourage and direct these efforts, and I expect to represent CGF on the  Water District's Environmental Advisory Committee.

 Santa Clara County and the City of San Jose are considering Habitat  Conservation Plans (HCPs) to manage effects of development on endangered  species. Depending on the outcome, these HCPs could significantly benefit  the environment, or they could trade away the strong protections of the  federal and state Endangered Species Acts for minimal mitigation that  does little to help the species or the environment. CGF and other environmental  groups have been tracking this possibility, and by working with the best  scientific experts available, we expect to ensure that if the HCP is passed,  it actually accomplishes the goal of helping rare species.

 Finally, we cannot forget the role of the County  General Plan and the protections it does or does not provide. Now  could be an excellent time for everyone, including CGF, to review the  General Plan policies and consider whether they could be improved.

Opportunities from diversity
In choosing our future priorities, we also have to keep in mind the changing  social perspective in this county - a highly diverse county in a highly  diverse state. Fifty-six percent of the people in Santa Clara County are  from communities of color. The opportunity that this diversity presents  is immense. Poll numbers have consistently showed minority support for  initiatives to protect water, parks, and open space is generally stronger  than that from white voters, and this support could be increased still  further by developing ties within communities of color.

 Minority communities often tend to be younger and have upward economic  mobility, which has important implications in the short- and long-term.  Today's working class Hispanic families can easily recognize the need  for clean air and adequate government services for their children, needs  that can be helped by good land use planning. Those families will also  be a source for the next generation of Silicon Valley millionaires. Increasing  connections with the environmental community can make them future champions  for open space, while decreasing connections could result in more golf  courses and giant homes overrunning county foothills.

Obviously, the physical, political, and societal state of the county are  interrelated and constantly changing, and that change brings opportunity  for new involvement in environmental issues.

Future views of the county
I hope to make repeat trips to that backpack camp every year, where night-time  views will give a kind of report card of the county's state. More lights  may appear in the urban areas, but good development that preserves the  environment is to be applauded. I hope to see few additional lights in  the current dark areas, but not because we want to exclude people's interests  in the land. The places where farm plants grow, cattle graze, and nature  thrives are all part of the coexistence between development and open space  that benefits us all, and Committee for Green Foothills will continue  to make sure that this coexistence stays balanced. I am very glad to do  my part in that work.


Published July 2003 in Green  Footnotes.
Page last updated July 7, 2003

 

 

      

Copyright 2001 Committee for Green Foothills

Photo by Cait  Hutnik.