|
||
|
News
|
|
|
The Mercury News By Truong Phuoc Khánh Development, it turns out, is in the eye of the builder. San Jose officials see a proposed sports complex in south Almaden Valley
as a place of grassy fields where kids can toss, bat and dribble balls. But residents and Santa Clara County planners say it's an example of bad urban growth. The McKean Road Sports Complex -- about 35 of a
total 77 acres owned by the San Jose Unified School District and leased to the city -- is slated to be built on a vacant site on McKean Road in an unincorporated area of the county. If city officials have
their way, it will feature up to 12 baseball, softball and soccer fields. On Monday, the San Jose Planning Commission will meet to consider approving the environmental impact report for the project. Based on its
recommendation, the city council will vote Dec. 7 to amend the city's general plan, paving the way for the design phase of the complex. Both sides fundamentally disagree about whether the project is considered a
permanent development. The site is zoned for agricultural use by the county. If the city wants to develop the land, it would need to annex the property, devise a comprehensive land-use plan and undergo an extensive
public review process. City planners maintain that because the project -- which won't even be equipped with permanent bleachers -- will not have city water, sewer or utility line extensions, it's not a
permanent development. In fact, the city's general plan amendment calls for the area to be used only for interim outdoor recreational use. The city has invested $594,000 -- most of it on environmental studies --
in the project to be operated by the private Almaden Youth Association. For at least a decade, the group has lobbied for playing fields in the area. Wary of crowds According to the group, that kind of intense activity is
not interim use, but more like permanent development. The complex would have three portable buildings, batting cages, a maintenance yard, a children's play lot, portable restrooms and 569 parking spaces. ``We, as the citizens of
Santa Clara County, have set up guidelines so that we can have smart growth, so that we don't become L.A.,'' said Maurice Adams, who lives near the proposed site. ``The guidelines are being violated and circumvented.'' Not true,
said Vice Mayor Pat Dando, a staunch supporter of the project. ``We're talking about a relatively small project with sports fields for children to play in,'' Dando said. ``A permanent project would mean you put in a water
system, lighting, build structures that would remain there for years. What we can develop on the site is grass, and that does not constitute permanent development.'' Permanent or not, city planners acknowledge the project comes
with significant environmental consequences that cannot be mitigated: loss of prime farm land; lack of underground water to irrigate the fields; noise; and pedestrian and bicycling safety. A number of public agencies and
environmental groups have raised serious concerns about the project. The Committee for Green Foothills, for example, says that by calling it an interim project, the city is being disingenuous because the conversion of farmland into
sports fields is a permanent alteration of Almaden Valley. The county, likewise, cites conflicts with numerous county and city general plan policies. "We think the sports complex is a very high intensity use
and not consistent with county zoning,'' said Lizanne Reynolds, deputy county counsel. Most households in the area rely on well water, tapped from the same aquifers that would be used to irrigate the sports
fields. The city's environmental study concluded that if there is a large decline in water levels, individual well owners may have difficulty meeting their water needs. The city now proposes to phase in
development of the fields, starting with five acres, and perhaps later installing artificial turf on the rest of the 35-acre site. "If we have a drought, obviously residents get first choice,'' said Dando.
"You don't water park fields when there is a drought.'' The site has no bicycle lanes or sidewalks, and the youth association would require parents to sign an agreement that restricts their children from
riding bicycles or walking to the site. Contract issues "They will get priority because they will have funded much, if not
all, of it,'' said City Attorney Rick Doyle. "But it is a public field. When it is not in use by the AYA, it will be open to the public.'' Page last updated December 1, 2004 . |
|
|
|